In re the Claim of Cole

45 A.D.3d 1229, 846 N.Y.S.2d 741
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 29, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 45 A.D.3d 1229 (In re the Claim of Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Cole, 45 A.D.3d 1229, 846 N.Y.S.2d 741 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 26, 2006, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant worked for the employer as a life insurance salesperson for approximately seven months until March 2006, when he submitted a letter of resignation. Having been advised by the employer that it was considering closing the office in which he worked, claimant decided that he no longer was going [1230]*1230to work in the insurance business and indicated in his resignation letter that he was breaking all ties with the employer and that he was going to attempt to go back to school. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board thereafter ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits upon the basis that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant appeals.

We affirm. It initially is noted that resigning from one’s employment in anticipation of a possible future discharge does not constitute good cause for leaving such employment (see Matter of Felice [Commissioner of Labor], 24 AD3d 992, 993 [2005]). As for claimant’s contention that he left his job because the employer failed to timely pay him commissions that he had earned, this created a credibility issue for resolution by the Board (see Matter of Felix [Pepsi Cola Newburgh Bottling Co.— Commissioner of Labor], 14 AD3d 926, 927 [2005]). Finally, we have examined claimant’s remaining argument that the Board improperly considered evidence not in the record and find it to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Fuentes
108 A.D.3d 1002 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
In re the Claim of Ruggiero
63 A.D.3d 1477 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
In re the Claim of Hughes
51 A.D.3d 1242 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
In re the Claim of Croughter
50 A.D.3d 1360 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 A.D.3d 1229, 846 N.Y.S.2d 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-cole-nyappdiv-2007.