In re the Claim of Colberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Colberg

201 A.D.2d 818, 607 N.Y.S.2d 194, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1143

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 10, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.2d 818 (In re the Claim of Colberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Colberg, 201 A.D.2d 818, 607 N.Y.S.2d 194, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 26, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Circumstances required that claimant vacate her apartment which was close to where she worked. When she was unable to find affordable housing in the same vicinity, she decided to quit her job. Claimant’s efforts to obtain suitable housing that was convenient to work were neither reasonable nor diligent. Under the circumstances, substantial evidence exists to support the decision of the Board that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 26, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Circumstances required that claimant vacate her apartment which was close to where she worked. When she was unable to find affordable housing in the same vicinity, she decided to quit her job. Claimant’s efforts to obtain suitable housing that was convenient to work were neither reasonable nor diligent. Under the circumstances, substantial evidence exists to support the decision of the Board that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 818, 607 N.Y.S.2d 194, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-colberg-nyappdiv-1994.