In re the Claim of Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Clark

198 A.D.2d 661, 603 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10556

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 198 A.D.2d 661 (In re the Claim of Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Clark, 198 A.D.2d 661, 603 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10556 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 10, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

[662]*662Claimant, a receptionist in a dental office, asked her employer if she could return to the hours she had previously worked. When her employer could not accommodate her request, claimant decided to leave work and not return. We find substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s decision that claimant left her employment for personal and noncompelling reasons and, therefore, without good cause.

Crew III, J. P., Cardona, White, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 10, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

[662]*662Claimant, a receptionist in a dental office, asked her employer if she could return to the hours she had previously worked. When her employer could not accommodate her request, claimant decided to leave work and not return. We find substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s decision that claimant left her employment for personal and noncompelling reasons and, therefore, without good cause.

Crew III, J. P., Cardona, White, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 661, 603 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-clark-nyappdiv-1993.