In re the Claim of Cirlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Cirlin

70 A.D.2d 1030, 418 N.Y.S.2d 172, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12663

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 21, 1979

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 70 A.D.2d 1030 (In re the Claim of Cirlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Cirlin, 70 A.D.2d 1030, 418 N.Y.S.2d 172, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12663 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinions

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 19, 1978, disqualifying claimant from unemployment insurance benefits. The board found that: "The credible evidence establishes that claimant violated two of the employer’s rules of which she had knowledge. During working hours, she selected the cheese, had it weighed and priced and took it out of the gourmet department without paying for it. Accordingly, we conclude that claimant’s violation of the employer’s reasonable rules constituted misconduct in connection with her employment.” There is substantial evidence in the record to support the board’s finding and, accordingly, the decision should be affirmed. Decision affirmed, without costs. Sweeney, J. P., Kane and Main, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 19, 1978, disqualifying claimant from unemployment insurance benefits. The board found that: "The credible evidence establishes that claimant violated two of the employer’s rules of which she had knowledge. During working hours, she selected the cheese, had it weighed and priced and took it out of the gourmet department without paying for it. Accordingly, we conclude that claimant’s violation of the employer’s reasonable rules constituted misconduct in connection with her employment.” There is substantial evidence in the record to support the board’s finding and, accordingly, the decision should be affirmed. Decision affirmed, without costs. Sweeney, J. P., Kane and Main, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.2d 1030, 418 N.Y.S.2d 172, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-cirlin-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack