In re the Claim of Chiosie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Chiosie

205 A.D.2d 819, 613 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5805

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 205 A.D.2d 819 (In re the Claim of Chiosie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Chiosie, 205 A.D.2d 819, 613 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

]Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 16, 1992, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Claimant was employed as a truck driver. He also incorporated a business, of which he was the president and sole shareholder, to transport automobiles. Claimant applied for unemployment insurance benefits after he lost his truck driving position. During that time claimant continued to have a financial interest in his corporation and stood to gain from its operation. We find that these facts provide substantial evidence to support the Board’s finding that claimant was not totally unemployed. We also find that the Board properly ruled that the overpayments to claimant are recoverable.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

]Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 16, 1992, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Claimant was employed as a truck driver. He also incorporated a business, of which he was the president and sole shareholder, to transport automobiles. Claimant applied for unemployment insurance benefits after he lost his truck driving position. During that time claimant continued to have a financial interest in his corporation and stood to gain from its operation. We find that these facts provide substantial evidence to support the Board’s finding that claimant was not totally unemployed. We also find that the Board properly ruled that the overpayments to claimant are recoverable.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 819, 613 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-chiosie-nyappdiv-1994.