In re the Claim of Chimento

172 A.D.2d 944, 568 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4573
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 11, 1991·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 2, 1990, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

The record reveals that claimant left her job as a chiropractic assistant because there was too much responsibility which caused her stress. First, we note that claimant’s weekend work schedule was entirely up to her and, therefore, she did not have to work seven days to complete her job duties. In addition, while claimant alleged that there were work-related stress problems, she received no medical advice to leave the job. Consequently, the decision that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause is supported by substantial evidence and must be upheld (see, Matter of Chaw kin [Catherwood], 18 AD2d 750).

Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Chimento, 172 A.D.2d 944, 568 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4573 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

172 A.D.2d 944 (In re the Claim of Chimento) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Roth
108 A.D.3d 906 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)