In re the Claim of Chick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Chick

209 A.D.2d 812, 618 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11112

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 209 A.D.2d 812 (In re the Claim of Chick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Chick, 209 A.D.2d 812, 618 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 27, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant left her job as an inspector after several other inspectors had been laid off by her employer. Claimant had not been informed by her employer that she would be laid off and, in fact, certain other inspectors had not been fired but had been transferred to new job assignments. Quitting in anticipation of discharge does not constitute good cause for leaving one’s employment. Under these circumstances, substantial evidence exists to support the Board’s decision that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Cardona, P. J., White, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 27, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant left her job as an inspector after several other inspectors had been laid off by her employer. Claimant had not been informed by her employer that she would be laid off and, in fact, certain other inspectors had not been fired but had been transferred to new job assignments. Quitting in anticipation of discharge does not constitute good cause for leaving one’s employment. Under these circumstances, substantial evidence exists to support the Board’s decision that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Cardona, P. J., White, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 A.D.2d 812, 618 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-chick-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack