In re the Claim of Chevres

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Chevres

286 A.D.2d 799, 729 N.Y.S.2d 818, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8409

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 13, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 286 A.D.2d 799 (In re the Claim of Chevres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Chevres, 286 A.D.2d 799, 729 N.Y.S.2d 818, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8409 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 25, 2001, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

After four months of employment as a field manager for a copy service, claimant demanded that the employer either provide him with a company vehicle or increase the amount of reimbursement for mileage incurred on his own vehicle in the performance of company business. When the employer refused, claimant offered to give two weeks notice, at which point the employer told claimant that he could leave immediately. Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant voluntarily left his employment for personal and noncompelling reasons (see, Matter of Baumann [Sweeney], 247 AD2d 696; Matter of Kudysch [Hillcrest Gen. Hosp. — Ross], 72 AD2d 901; see also, Matter of Devlin [Schmitt — Sweeney], 233 AD2d 664). Claimant’s remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J. P., Peters, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 25, 2001, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

After four months of employment as a field manager for a copy service, claimant demanded that the employer either provide him with a company vehicle or increase the amount of reimbursement for mileage incurred on his own vehicle in the performance of company business. When the employer refused, claimant offered to give two weeks notice, at which point the employer told claimant that he could leave immediately. Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant voluntarily left his employment for personal and noncompelling reasons (see, Matter of Baumann [Sweeney], 247 AD2d 696; Matter of Kudysch [Hillcrest Gen. Hosp. — Ross], 72 AD2d 901; see also, Matter of Devlin [Schmitt — Sweeney], 233 AD2d 664). Claimant’s remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J. P., Peters, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 A.D.2d 799, 729 N.Y.S.2d 818, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-chevres-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack