In re the Claim of Chawkin

18 A.D.2d 750, 235 N.Y.S.2d 475, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6198
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 28, 1962
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 18 A.D.2d 750 (In re the Claim of Chawkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Chawkin, 18 A.D.2d 750, 235 N.Y.S.2d 475, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6198 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualifying claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the grounds that he voluntarily left employment without good cause. The board adopted the Referee’s finding that claimant, ain accountant, left employment because he resented his employer’s criticism. While claimant denied any such resentment before the Referee, the record is sufficient to substantiate the board’s finding that this was the actual reason claimant left employment. Claimant asserts that he left because the employer’s demands were affecting his health. Claimant admitted, however, that he had not 'received medical advice to terminate his employment, and the record contains no medical proof that his health was in any way affected by his employment (cf. Matter of Drach [Catherwood], 17 [751]*751A D 2d 998). The present record merely presents a question of fact which is within the power of the board to determine (Matter of Karman [Lubin], 2 A D 2d 626). We also find no merit in claimant’s contention that he was not afforded a fair and impartial hearing. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Aronson
194 A.D.2d 1046 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re the Claim of Hollywood
193 A.D.2d 1033 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re the Claim of Silver
180 A.D.2d 996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re the Claim of Mele
176 A.D.2d 414 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
In re the Claim of Wolfbiss
173 A.D.2d 1047 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Brotherton v. Morgan
522 P.2d 1210 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 A.D.2d 750, 235 N.Y.S.2d 475, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-chawkin-nyappdiv-1962.