In re the Claim of Chassman
This text of 50 A.D.2d 1000 (In re the Claim of Chassman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 11, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective July 11, 1974 because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Questions of credibility and whether separation from employment was for good cause within the meaning of section 593 of the Labor Law are factual matters within the province of the board to resolve (Matter of Rubinstein [Catherwood], 33 AD2d 950) and where, as here, the [1001]*1001board rejected claimant’s testimony and accepted his earlier statements when applying for benefits, it cannot be successfully argued that its determination thereof rests upon other than substantial evidence (cf. Matter of Jensen [Levine], 49 AD2d 794). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 A.D.2d 1000, 376 N.Y.S.2d 254, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-chassman-nyappdiv-1975.