Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re the Claim of Centineo

In re the Claim of Centineo

53 A.D.2d 759, 384 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13531
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 10, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 53 A.D.2d 759 (In re the Claim of Centineo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Centineo, 53 A.D.2d 759, 384 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13531 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 2, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective May 14, 1975 on the ground of misconduct. Claimant, an automobile salesman, was directed by his employer to proceed to another automobile agency and pick up a car which he had sold. When claimant refused to do so, he was discharged. The board held that claimant’s conduct constituted misconduct since it was necessary to bring the automobile in question to the employer’s premises in order to complete the sale. The board found that the employer’s request was reasonable. A refusal to complete work assigned in the regular course of the employer’s business constitutes misconduct so as to disqualify a person from receiving unemployment insurance benefits. Decision affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Jonassen
233 A.D.2d 738 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
In re the Claim of Patrick
194 A.D.2d 1053 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re the Claim of Kennedy
193 A.D.2d 1045 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re D'Amico
186 A.D.2d 331 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re the Claim of Belilovsky
181 A.D.2d 936 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re the Claim of Lange
178 A.D.2d 891 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
In re the Claim of Giotis
176 A.D.2d 1164 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
In re the Claims of Oswald
172 A.D.2d 938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
In re the Claim of Severino
170 A.D.2d 739 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
In re the Claim of Akpan
166 A.D.2d 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
In re the Claim of Speciner
166 A.D.2d 848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
In re the Claim of Fisher
138 A.D.2d 912 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 A.D.2d 759, 384 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-centineo-nyappdiv-1976.