In re the Claim of Canady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Canady

49 A.D.2d 783, 372 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10815

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 18, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 783 (In re the Claim of Canady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Canady, 49 A.D.2d 783, 372 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10815 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 11, 1974, which affirmed a referee’s decision sustaining the Industrial Commissioner’s initial determination that the claimant was ineligible to receive benefits effective March 4, 1974 because he was unavailable for employment. The record establishes minimal job seeking efforts and, accordingly, the board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. The claimant’s excuse of [784]*784inadequate funds to make a job search was for the respondent and the board to weigh and, in any event, would not explain his failure to seek employment. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Kane, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 11, 1974, which affirmed a referee’s decision sustaining the Industrial Commissioner’s initial determination that the claimant was ineligible to receive benefits effective March 4, 1974 because he was unavailable for employment. The record establishes minimal job seeking efforts and, accordingly, the board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. The claimant’s excuse of [784]*784inadequate funds to make a job search was for the respondent and the board to weigh and, in any event, would not explain his failure to seek employment. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Kane, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 783, 372 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-canady-nyappdiv-1975.