In re the Claim of Campos

253 A.D.2d 935, 678 N.Y.S.2d 151, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9381
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 10, 1998·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 2, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant resigned from his employment as an accountant for a bank after he was transferred to the accounting department as a junior accountant, which claimant considered to be a demotion. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, finding that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause, disqualified him from receiving benefits. Claimant’s contention that he was denied due process because the Board considered hearsay evidence is without merit. Hearings regarding unemployment insurance benefits are not governed by technical rules of evidence (see, Labor Law § 622 [2]; Matter of Ellenport [Sweeney], 242 AD2d 821). Furthermore, the evidence presented at the hearing regarding the circumstances surrounding claimant’s resignation provides substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Yesawich Jr., Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Campos, 253 A.D.2d 935, 678 N.Y.S.2d 151, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9381 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

253 A.D.2d 935 (In re the Claim of Campos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Fratello
271 A.D.2d 880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re the Claim of Barrett
270 A.D.2d 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re the Claim of Neville
264 A.D.2d 918 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)