In re the Claim of Camerino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Camerino

222 A.D.2d 796, 634 N.Y.S.2d 273, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12644

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 7, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 222 A.D.2d 796 (In re the Claim of Camerino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Camerino, 222 A.D.2d 796, 634 N.Y.S.2d 273, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 30, 1994, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant was employed as the supervisor of electricians at Vassar College. He was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Upon review of the record, we find that substantial evidence supports this determination. Claimant’s manager testified that claimant became loud and used profanity when questioned about a particular job. He stated that claimant thereafter failed to report to his office as requested and left the job site. In view of this, substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Accordingly, we decline to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Casey, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 30, 1994, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant was employed as the supervisor of electricians at Vassar College. He was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Upon review of the record, we find that substantial evidence supports this determination. Claimant’s manager testified that claimant became loud and used profanity when questioned about a particular job. He stated that claimant thereafter failed to report to his office as requested and left the job site. In view of this, substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Accordingly, we decline to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Casey, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 A.D.2d 796, 634 N.Y.S.2d 273, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-camerino-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack