In re the Claim of Cadicamo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Cadicamo

198 A.D.2d 703, 605 N.Y.S.2d 966, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10755

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 198 A.D.2d 703 (In re the Claim of Cadicamo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Cadicamo, 198 A.D.2d 703, 605 N.Y.S.2d 966, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10755 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 2, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was employed as a correction officer until terminated for leaving his post without authorization and misappropriating State property. Substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that these acts constituted misconduct and claimant was therefore properly disqualified from receiving benefits.

Mercure, J. P., Cardona, White, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 2, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was employed as a correction officer until terminated for leaving his post without authorization and misappropriating State property. Substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that these acts constituted misconduct and claimant was therefore properly disqualified from receiving benefits.

Mercure, J. P., Cardona, White, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 703, 605 N.Y.S.2d 966, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-cadicamo-nyappdiv-1993.