In re the Claim of Cabrera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Cabrera

50 A.D.2d 986, 376 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12187

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 986 (In re the Claim of Cabrera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Cabrera, 50 A.D.2d 986, 376 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12187 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 24, 1974, which affirmed the decision of a referee modifying and sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from, receiving benefits because he lost his employment through misconduct. Claimant, an elevator operator in an apartment house, had been previously warned orally and in writing, in both English and Spanish, about his absenteeism and failure to notify his employer. Although claimant alleged that he was sick on the day in question and tried to call his employer, no medical testimony was presented to support that contention. Claimant’s continued absence without a compelling reason, after warning by his employer, is substantial evidence of misconduct and the decision of the board must be affirmed. Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 24, 1974, which affirmed the decision of a referee modifying and sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from, receiving benefits because he lost his employment through misconduct. Claimant, an elevator operator in an apartment house, had been previously warned orally and in writing, in both English and Spanish, about his absenteeism and failure to notify his employer. Although claimant alleged that he was sick on the day in question and tried to call his employer, no medical testimony was presented to support that contention. Claimant’s continued absence without a compelling reason, after warning by his employer, is substantial evidence of misconduct and the decision of the board must be affirmed. Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 986, 376 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-cabrera-nyappdiv-1975.