In re the Claim of Bucknor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Bucknor

205 A.D.2d 816, 613 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5813

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 205 A.D.2d 816 (In re the Claim of Bucknor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Bucknor, 205 A.D.2d 816, 613 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5813 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 23, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant worked as a senior clerk for a securities clearing house. On an updated personnel form claimant provided false personal information to her employer, thereby concealing data which would have revealed a violation of a company policy. There is no dispute that claimant signed a form stating that she had received and read the employer’s ethics code. Under the circumstances, substantial evidence exists to support the decision of the Board that claimant’s dishonesty, which was [817]*817potentially detrimental to her employer’s interests, constituted disqualifying misconduct.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 23, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant worked as a senior clerk for a securities clearing house. On an updated personnel form claimant provided false personal information to her employer, thereby concealing data which would have revealed a violation of a company policy. There is no dispute that claimant signed a form stating that she had received and read the employer’s ethics code. Under the circumstances, substantial evidence exists to support the decision of the Board that claimant’s dishonesty, which was [817]*817potentially detrimental to her employer’s interests, constituted disqualifying misconduct.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 816, 613 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-bucknor-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack