In re the Claim of Bryant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Bryant

206 A.D.2d 653, 614 N.Y.S.2d 938, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7328

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 14, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 206 A.D.2d 653 (In re the Claim of Bryant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Bryant, 206 A.D.2d 653, 614 N.Y.S.2d 938, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7328 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 5, 1993, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision dismissing claimant’s appeal for failure to file a timely notice of appeal.

Claimant’s case was reopened by the Board and the sole issue considered was whether there had been compliance with the procedural safeguards set forth in the consent judgment in Municipal Labor Comm. v Sitkin (1983 WL 44294 [US Dist Ct, SD NY, Aug. 1, 1983, Carter, J., 79 Civ 5899]). Claimant fails to allege any procedural errors on appeal and we conclude that the Board’s determination is supported by substantial evidence.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, White and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 5, 1993, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision dismissing claimant’s appeal for failure to file a timely notice of appeal.

Claimant’s case was reopened by the Board and the sole issue considered was whether there had been compliance with the procedural safeguards set forth in the consent judgment in Municipal Labor Comm. v Sitkin (1983 WL 44294 [US Dist Ct, SD NY, Aug. 1, 1983, Carter, J., 79 Civ 5899]). Claimant fails to allege any procedural errors on appeal and we conclude that the Board’s determination is supported by substantial evidence.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, White and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 A.D.2d 653, 614 N.Y.S.2d 938, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-bryant-nyappdiv-1994.