In re the Claim of Brown

281 A.D. 935, 119 N.Y.S.2d 593
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 18, 1953
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 281 A.D. 935 (In re the Claim of Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Brown, 281 A.D. 935, 119 N.Y.S.2d 593 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

Appeal by the Industrial Commissioner from decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which modified the decision of an unemployment insurance referee disqualifying claimant for insurance benefits. Claimant was a woman seventy years of age. Her son, her husband and herself were officers of a corporation known as the Federal Broadcasting System, Inc., which operated a radio station in Rochester, New York. Claimant was secretary of the corporation, her husband was treasurer, and their son was president. The latter owned all of the stock. The corporation was a .family affair and the amount of salaries paid to the corporate officers depended on the profits in any given year. These amounts were determined solely by the son, who was the president and sole owner of the stock. At the close of the business year 1950 it was determined that the financial affairs of the corporation did not warrant payment of any salary to claimant. The issues presented upon appeal are whether claimant, as a corporate officer performing services without compensation because of the financial condition of the corporation, was totally unemployed within the meaning of the statute, and whether she was available for employment within the meaning of the same statute. We think there is no substantial evidence in the record to sustain the determination that claimant was available for employment and, therefore, eligible for benefits and hence that such a decision was erroneous as a matter of law. We also think that the record fails to furnish any substantial proof to sustain a finding that claimant was totally unemployed. Decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reversed, on the law, without costs. Foster, P. J., Brewster, Bergan, Coon and Imrie, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of De Wald
50 A.D.2d 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
In re the Claim of Marvin
24 A.D.2d 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 A.D. 935, 119 N.Y.S.2d 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-brown-nyappdiv-1953.