In Re the Claim of Briem

418 N.E.2d 670, 52 N.Y.2d 842, 437 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2172
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 8, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 418 N.E.2d 670 (In Re the Claim of Briem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re the Claim of Briem, 418 N.E.2d 670, 52 N.Y.2d 842, 437 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2172 (N.Y. 1981).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (71 AD2d 752).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Persaud (City of New York--Commissioner of Labor)
2025 NY Slip Op 02379 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
In re the Claim of Childs
69 A.D.3d 1070 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re the Claim of Tucek
277 A.D.2d 628 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re the Claim of Napolitano
264 A.D.2d 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
In re the Claim of Caplan
238 A.D.2d 660 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re the Claim of Bernet
149 A.D.2d 834 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
In re the Claim of Thrist
105 A.D.2d 996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
418 N.E.2d 670, 52 N.Y.2d 842, 437 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-briem-ny-1981.