In Re the Claim of Briem
418 N.E.2d 670, 52 N.Y.2d 842, 437 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2172
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (71 AD2d 752).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Claim of Briem, 418 N.E.2d 670, 52 N.Y.2d 842, 437 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2172 (N.Y. 1981).
418 N.E.2d 670 (In Re the Claim of Briem) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Persaud (City of New York--Commissioner of Labor)
2025 NY Slip Op 02379 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
In re the Claim of Childs
69 A.D.3d 1070 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re the Claim of Tucek
277 A.D.2d 628 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re the Claim of Napolitano
264 A.D.2d 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
In re the Claim of Caplan
238 A.D.2d 660 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re the Claim of Bernet
149 A.D.2d 834 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
In re the Claim of Thrist
105 A.D.2d 996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)