In re the Claim of Boyle

247 A.D.2d 809, 668 N.Y.S.2d 514, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1881
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 26, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 247 A.D.2d 809 (In re the Claim of Boyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Boyle, 247 A.D.2d 809, 668 N.Y.S.2d 514, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 25, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from his employment as a bus driver after he took a week off from work during the employer’s busiest time of year without obtaining proper authorization. Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant lost his employment under disqualifying circumstances. This Court has held that a claimant’s unauthorized absence from work may be construed as disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Svetlich [Sweeney], 236 AD2d 762), especially where, as here, the absence is detrimental to the employer’s best interests (see, id.). Claimant’s assertion that his absence from work was approved by his supervisor raised an issue of credibility for resolution by the Board (see, Matter of Jonassen [Sweeney], 233 AD2d 738).

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Mills
7 A.D.3d 845 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re the Claim of Lyubinskaya
288 A.D.2d 551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
In re the Claim of Parker
274 A.D.2d 734 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re the Claim of Gallagher
273 A.D.2d 662 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re the Claim of Estevez
272 A.D.2d 732 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re the Claim of Zevallos
268 A.D.2d 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re the Claim of Ellis
264 A.D.2d 932 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
In re the Claim of Seely
263 A.D.2d 650 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
In re the Claim of Burns
259 A.D.2d 797 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
In re the Claim of Guarino
249 A.D.2d 881 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D.2d 809, 668 N.Y.S.2d 514, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-boyle-nyappdiv-1998.