In re the Claim of Boyd

51 A.D.2d 1097, 381 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11951

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 25, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective December 25, 1974 because he left his employment without good cause. The issue of whether claimant voluntarily left his employment three hours before the end of the workday and returned after the holiday only to pick up his pay check, thereby disqualifying himself for benefits, is a question of fact and there is substantial evidence in the record to support the conclusion of the board (Matter of Adams [Levine], 50 AD2d 1026; Matter of Dominique [Catherwood] 32 AD2d 718; Matter of Haynes [Cather-wood], 30 AD2d 722; Labor Law, § 593, subd 1). Decision affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Sweeney, Mahoney, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Boyd, 51 A.D.2d 1097, 381 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11951 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

51 A.D.2d 1097 (In re the Claim of Boyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Haynes
30 A.D.2d 722 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
In re the Claim of Dominique
32 A.D.2d 718 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)
In re the Claim of Adams
50 A.D.2d 1026 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)