In re the Claim of Bonsignore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Bonsignore

53 A.D.2d 761, 384 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13535

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 53 A.D.2d 761 (In re the Claim of Bonsignore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Bonsignore, 53 A.D.2d 761, 384 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13535 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 13, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying the claimant from receiving benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The board found that claimant, a switchboard operator and admitting clerk, left her employment because she was not given the same pay increase which other employees received and concluded the claimant’s leaving was unjustified and thus without good cause. We find presented solely issues of fact and credibility, and since the record contains substantial evidence to support the board’s determination, it must be upheld (Matter of Haynes [Catherwood] 30 AD2d 722). Decision affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 13, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying the claimant from receiving benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The board found that claimant, a switchboard operator and admitting clerk, left her employment because she was not given the same pay increase which other employees received and concluded the claimant’s leaving was unjustified and thus without good cause. We find presented solely issues of fact and credibility, and since the record contains substantial evidence to support the board’s determination, it must be upheld (Matter of Haynes [Catherwood] 30 AD2d 722). Decision affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 A.D.2d 761, 384 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-bonsignore-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack