In re the Claim of Bomwell

49 A.D.2d 790, 372 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10831
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 25, 1975·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 20, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determinations of the Industrial Commissioner (1) disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective August 24, 1974 because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause and (2) holding that claimant willfully made r false statement to obtain benefits by reason of which a forfeiture of four effective days was imposed as a penalty in reduction of his future benefit rights. There is substantial evidence in this record to support the board’s finding that claimant left his employment for the purpose of reestablishing his residence in another area of the State. As to the board’s finding that the claimant made a willful misrepresentation when he stated that he was no longer working because business was slow, the board properly imposed a forfeiture (Labor Law, § 594). Willful misrepresentation is a question of fact and the board’s decision, supported by substantial evidence, should not be disturbed (Matter of Kansky [Catherwood] 27 AD2d 887). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Bomwell, 49 A.D.2d 790, 372 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10831 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

49 A.D.2d 790 (In re the Claim of Bomwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Cassisa-Luster
194 A.D.2d 1048 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re the Claim of Mantel
67 A.D.2d 786 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
People v. Golinski
62 A.D.2d 1101 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)