In re the Claim of Bickman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Bickman

50 A.D.2d 956, 376 N.Y.S.2d 31, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 956 (In re the Claim of Bickman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Bickman, 50 A.D.2d 956, 376 N.Y.S.2d 31, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 20, 1974, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective July 13, 1974 because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Substantial evidence supports the board’s finding that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The conflicts in the testimony of the claimant and the employer were for the board to resolve. The determination of credibility is within the board’s province (Matter of Rubinstein [Catherwood], 33 AD2d 950). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Koreman, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 20, 1974, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective July 13, 1974 because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Substantial evidence supports the board’s finding that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The conflicts in the testimony of the claimant and the employer were for the board to resolve. The determination of credibility is within the board’s province (Matter of Rubinstein [Catherwood], 33 AD2d 950). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Koreman, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 956, 376 N.Y.S.2d 31, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-bickman-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack