In re the Claim of Bicjan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Bicjan

201 A.D.2d 813, 607 N.Y.S.2d 200, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1159

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 10, 1994·Published

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 7, 1992, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

We find substantial evidence to support the Board’s finding that claimant, who had been employed as a substitute teacher during the 1990-1991 school year, had no reasonable assurance of employment during the next school year and was thus eligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits during the summer of 1991. We have considered the employer’s other arguments and find them to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 7, 1992, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

We find substantial evidence to support the Board’s finding that claimant, who had been employed as a substitute teacher during the 1990-1991 school year, had no reasonable assurance of employment during the next school year and was thus eligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits during the summer of 1991. We have considered the employer’s other arguments and find them to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

In re the Claim of Bicjan, 201 A.D.2d 813, 607 N.Y.S.2d 200, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1159 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

201 A.D.2d 813 (In re the Claim of Bicjan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.