In re the Claim of Berry

264 A.D.2d 923, 695 N.Y.S.2d 209, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9345
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 23, 1999·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 19, 1998, which ruled that claimants were entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

Claimants, both licensed practical nurses, were discharged by the employer, a hospital, for verbally abusing three elderly female patients. It was alleged that claimants yelled at the patients, woke them up to take them to the bathroom and then “herded” them like cattle. Claimants’ applications for unemployment insurance benefits were denied and, at the ensuing hearing, the employer produced witnesses who either were not present during the alleged incidents or, in fact, corroborated the testimony of claimants who denied any rude or abusive behavior on their part.

We find that substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s ruling that claimants did not lose their employment under disqualifying circumstances and were entitled to unemployment insurance benefits (see, Matter of McDuffie [Menorah Home & Hosp. — Commissioner of Labor], 257 AD2d '824). We decline to substitute our judgment for that of the Board, even when the Board’s resolution of credibility issues differs from that reached by the Administrative Law Judge (see, Matter of Higgins [Marketsoft, Inc. — Commissioner of Labor], 257 AD2d 881; Matter of Phillips [Commissioner of Labor], 257 AD2d 867).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decisions are affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Berry, 264 A.D.2d 923, 695 N.Y.S.2d 209, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9345 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

264 A.D.2d 923 (In re the Claim of Berry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Figueroa
2 A.D.3d 952 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re the Claim of Smith
278 A.D.2d 634 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re the Claim of Palmer
273 A.D.2d 525 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)