In Re the Claim of Berger
364 N.E.2d 848, 41 N.Y.2d 1065, 41 N.Y. 1065, 396 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2062
Opinion
Order reversed, with costs, and the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reinstated. The board’s determination that the employer-employee relationship continued until the claimant exhausted all of his leave credits was rational and should not be disturbed (Matter of Fisher [Levine], 36 NY2d 146, 150, 153).
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg. Judges Gabrielli and Cooke dissent and vote to affirm on the memorandum at the Appellate Division (53 AD2d 730).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Claim of Berger, 364 N.E.2d 848, 41 N.Y.2d 1065, 41 N.Y. 1065, 396 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2062 (N.Y. 1977).
364 N.E.2d 848 (In Re the Claim of Berger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Claim of Jowers
239 A.D.2d 638 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re the Claim of Fuchs
177 A.D.2d 769 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Lottman v. Piper Industries, Inc.
726 F. Supp. 384 (N.D. New York, 1989)
In re the Claim of Rappaport
144 A.D.2d 141 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
In re the Claim of Pappas
112 A.D.2d 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
In re the Claim of Maraldo
112 A.D.2d 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Hock v. Commonwealth
413 A.2d 444 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
Gonzalez v. Progressive Tool & Die Co.
455 F. Supp. 363 (E.D. New York, 1978)