In re the Claim of Berg

200 A.D.2d 847, 606 N.Y.S.2d 799, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 241
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 13, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 2, 1992, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

In light of evidence that, during the eligible period, claimant started his own business installing telephone lines and actively pursued the means of making this business a success, there is substantial evidence for the Board’s conclusion that claimant was not totally unemployed. Because these activities [848] took place at the same time claimant was collecting benefits and representing that he was not working, there is also evidence to support the determination that claimant made willful misrepresentations to obtain benefits.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Berg, 200 A.D.2d 847, 606 N.Y.S.2d 799, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 241 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

200 A.D.2d 847 (In re the Claim of Berg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Baumbach
250 A.D.2d 918 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)