In re the Claim of Benson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Benson

130 A.D.3d 1117, 10 N.Y.S.3d 915

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 2015

StatusPublished

This text of 130 A.D.3d 1117 (In re the Claim of Benson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Benson, 130 A.D.3d 1117, 10 N.Y.S.3d 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Lahtinen, J.R

Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 2, 2013, which ruled that Mastroianni Bros., Inc. was liable for additional unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration paid to claimant and others similarly situated.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is controlled by our decision in the companion case of Matter of Mastroianni Bros., Inc. (Commissioner of Labor) (130 AD3d 1117 [2015] [decided herewith]). Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decisions that claimant, a driver/ distributor for Mastroianni Bros., Inc., was an employee for purposes of unemployment insurance.

Garry, Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decisions are affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lahtinen, J.R

Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 2, 2013, which ruled that Mastroianni Bros., Inc. was liable for additional unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration paid to claimant and others similarly situated.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is controlled by our decision in the companion case of Matter of Mastroianni Bros., Inc. (Commissioner of Labor) (130 AD3d 1117 [2015] [decided herewith]). Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decisions that claimant, a driver/ distributor for Mastroianni Bros., Inc., was an employee for purposes of unemployment insurance.

Garry, Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decisions are affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 A.D.3d 1117, 10 N.Y.S.3d 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-benson-nyappdiv-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack