In re the Claim of Baxter

50 A.D.2d 642, 375 N.Y.S.2d 57, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12462
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 6, 1975·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 3, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining initial determinations of the Industrial Commissioner holding claimant ineligible to receive benefits effective February 7, 1975 because she was not totally unemployed and ineligible to accumulate any effective days in the week ending February 16, 1975 because she had earnings in excess of $95 in that statutory week; charging her with an overpayment of $68 ruled to be recoverable; and [643] holding that she willfully made a false statement to obtain benefits for which a forfeiture of 16 effective days was imposed. There is substantial evidence to support the finding of claimant’s lack of total unemployment (Matter of Saffiotti [Catherwood], 28 AD2d 1013). This issue as well as that of willful misrepresentation is a question of fact for the board, and when, as here, its determination is supported by substantial evidence, including documentary proof, it must be affirmed (Matter of Soroka [Catherwood] 24 AD2d 920). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Koreman and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Baxter, 50 A.D.2d 642, 375 N.Y.S.2d 57, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12462 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

50 A.D.2d 642 (In re the Claim of Baxter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Golinski
62 A.D.2d 1101 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
In re the Claim of Loeber
51 A.D.2d 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)