In re the Claim of Batts

264 A.D.2d 932, 694 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9341
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 23, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 264 A.D.2d 932 (In re the Claim of Batts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Batts, 264 A.D.2d 932, 694 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9341 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 23, 1998, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant, a program director for a social service agency’s crime victims program, was discharged after it was discovered that he had submitted a grant proposal on behalf of a competing agency. No evidence was presented to establish that claimant submitted a funding proposal on behalf of the employer; indeed, claimant furnished false information to the funding [933]*933board concerning the future existence of the employer’s crime victims program and listed himself and four subordinates as employees of the competing agency. Under such circumstances, we find that substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits due to misconduct. Conduct that is potentially detrimental to the employer’s best interests may constitute misconduct (see generally, Matter of Blickley [Sweeney], 247 AD2d 738). Here, the loss of the grants could have resulted in the employer losing funding in excess of $100,000. Claimant’s proffered excuse for his conduct presented a credibility issue for resolution by the Board (see, Matter of Hawkins [Commissioner of Labor], 254 AD2d 558, 559). We have examined claimant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Bodah
73 A.D.3d 1378 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 A.D.2d 932, 694 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-batts-nyappdiv-1999.