In re the Claim of Bates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Bates

33 A.D.2d 596, 304 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3129

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 20, 1969

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 A.D.2d 596 (In re the Claim of Bates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Bates, 33 A.D.2d 596, 304 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court.

Appeal by the claimant from a decision of. the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 19, 1968, which sustained a determination of the respondent that claimant had made a willful misrepresentation to obtain benefits. The respondent made an initial determination on or about March 18, 1968 that the claimant had altered the reporting date on her identification booklet from March 4 to March 14. The claimant duly requested a hearing and thereafter she was granted an adjournment. On May 9, 1968 the hearing was held. The issue concerned whether the claimant had changed a date in the identification booklet maintained by claimant. There was testimony by the employment interviewer and by the claimant. The board found that.the claimant was responsible for the change of date. The issue was factual and supported by substantial evidence. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court.

Appeal by the claimant from a decision of. the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 19, 1968, which sustained a determination of the respondent that claimant had made a willful misrepresentation to obtain benefits. The respondent made an initial determination on or about March 18, 1968 that the claimant had altered the reporting date on her identification booklet from March 4 to March 14. The claimant duly requested a hearing and thereafter she was granted an adjournment. On May 9, 1968 the hearing was held. The issue concerned whether the claimant had changed a date in the identification booklet maintained by claimant. There was testimony by the employment interviewer and by the claimant. The board found that.the claimant was responsible for the change of date. The issue was factual and supported by substantial evidence. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 596, 304 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-bates-nyappdiv-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack