In re the Claim of Barry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Barry

199 A.D.2d 807, 605 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12216

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 199 A.D.2d 807 (In re the Claim of Barry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Barry, 199 A.D.2d 807, 605 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12216 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 25, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was employed as an administrative assistant. The employer’s request that claimant take her lunch hour only between 12:00 p.m. and 1:00 p.m. was reasonable and her refusal to do so constituted misconduct. We therefore find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding.

Weiss, P. J., Cardona, White, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 25, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was employed as an administrative assistant. The employer’s request that claimant take her lunch hour only between 12:00 p.m. and 1:00 p.m. was reasonable and her refusal to do so constituted misconduct. We therefore find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding.

Weiss, P. J., Cardona, White, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 A.D.2d 807, 605 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-barry-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack