In re the Claim of Badrajan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Badrajan

275 A.D.2d 830, 713 N.Y.S.2d 99, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9203

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 14, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 275 A.D.2d 830 (In re the Claim of Badrajan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Badrajan, 275 A.D.2d 830, 713 N.Y.S.2d 99, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 6, 2000, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he did not have sufficient weeks of covered employment to file a valid original claim.

We find no reason to disturb the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits because he lacked sufficient weeks of covered employment to file a valid original claim. Claimant indicated on his October 1999 original claim for benefits that his last employment ended in August 1998. Inasmuch as claimant had covered employment in only one calendar quarter of the base period and none in the alternate base period (see, Labor Law §§ 520, 527), substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision.

Crew III, J. P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 6, 2000, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he did not have sufficient weeks of covered employment to file a valid original claim.

We find no reason to disturb the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits because he lacked sufficient weeks of covered employment to file a valid original claim. Claimant indicated on his October 1999 original claim for benefits that his last employment ended in August 1998. Inasmuch as claimant had covered employment in only one calendar quarter of the base period and none in the alternate base period (see, Labor Law §§ 520, 527), substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision.

Crew III, J. P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 830, 713 N.Y.S.2d 99, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-badrajan-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack