In re the Claim of Arturi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Arturi

215 A.D.2d 845, 626 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5041

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 11, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 215 A.D.2d 845 (In re the Claim of Arturi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Arturi, 215 A.D.2d 845, 626 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5041 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Appeal Board, September 28, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Upon review of the record, we find that there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision that claimant voluntarily left his position as a maintenance worker without good cause. The undisputed evidence establishes that claimant refused his supervisor’s request to perform duties which were part of his job and, when told that if he did not like it he could leave, promptly left the work site. Under these facts, the Board’s decision must be upheld.

Mikoll, J. P, Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ, concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Appeal Board, September 28, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Upon review of the record, we find that there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision that claimant voluntarily left his position as a maintenance worker without good cause. The undisputed evidence establishes that claimant refused his supervisor’s request to perform duties which were part of his job and, when told that if he did not like it he could leave, promptly left the work site. Under these facts, the Board’s decision must be upheld.

Mikoll, J. P, Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ, concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 A.D.2d 845, 626 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-arturi-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack