In re the Claim of Apa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Apa

220 A.D.2d 916, 632 N.Y.S.2d 326, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10186

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 19, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 220 A.D.2d 916 (In re the Claim of Apa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Apa, 220 A.D.2d 916, 632 N.Y.S.2d 326, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10186 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 25, 1994, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant resigned from her position as financial manager of an advertising agency while on maternity leave. Her resignation was precipitated by her supervisor’s harassment and failure to give claimant a raise or bonus because of her maternity leave. Although claimant’s employer discharged claimant’s supervisor while claimant was on maternity leave, claimant refused to reconsider her resignation. Inasmuch as claimant chose to leave her employment despite her employer’s efforts to remedy the problems which led to her resignation, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 25, 1994, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant resigned from her position as financial manager of an advertising agency while on maternity leave. Her resignation was precipitated by her supervisor’s harassment and failure to give claimant a raise or bonus because of her maternity leave. Although claimant’s employer discharged claimant’s supervisor while claimant was on maternity leave, claimant refused to reconsider her resignation. Inasmuch as claimant chose to leave her employment despite her employer’s efforts to remedy the problems which led to her resignation, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 A.D.2d 916, 632 N.Y.S.2d 326, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-apa-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack