In re the Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law Made by Steinberg

263 A.D. 916, 32 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7353
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 14, 1942·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, affirming the decision of a referee which denied benefits to claimant on the ground that she was unavailable for employment. Claimant relinquished her employment because of her pregnancy. There is evidence to sustain the finding that she herself withdrew from the labor market and was unavailable for employment. Decision affirmed, without costs. Present — Hill, P. J.„ Crapser, Bliss, Schenek and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law Made by Steinberg, 263 A.D. 916, 32 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7353 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

263 A.D. 916 (In re the Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law Made by Steinberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moulton v. Iowa Employment Security Commission
34 N.W.2d 211 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1948)
Wolpers v. Unemployment Compensation Commission
186 S.W.2d 440 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1945)
Haynes v. Unemployment Compensation Commission
183 S.W.2d 77 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1944)