In Re the City of San Antonio v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re the City of San Antonio v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 12, 2025·No. 04-25-00105-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-25-00105-CV

In re THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, Relator Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice (dissenting) 2 Adrian A. Spears II, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 12, 2025 PETITON FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On February 18, 2025, relator filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. This court has determined relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021CI19212, styled Lauran Bienek v. City of San Antonio, pending in the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Nicole Garza presiding. 2 Because Justice Brissette is of the tentative opinion that a serious question concerning the relief sought requires further consideration, she would request a response. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-25-00105-CV

In re THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, Relator Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice (dissenting) 2 Adrian A. Spears II, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 12, 2025 PETITON FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On February 18, 2025, relator filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. This court has determined relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021CI19212, styled Lauran Bienek v. City of San Antonio, pending in the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Nicole Garza presiding. 2 Because Justice Brissette is of the tentative opinion that a serious question concerning the relief sought requires further consideration, she would request a response. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b)(1).

In Re the City of San Antonio v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

In Re the City of San Antonio v. the State of Texas (In Re the City of San Antonio v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.