In Re the City of San Antonio, Acting by and Through the City Public Service Board of San Antonio v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re the City of San Antonio, Acting by and Through the City Public Service Board of San Antonio v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 5, 2025·No. 04-25-00455-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-25-00455-CV

IN RE THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE CITY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD OF SAN ANTONIO

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 5, 2025 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On July 14, 2025, relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus challenging respondent’s June 12, 2025 order requiring it to pay the real party in interest $2,540 in attorneys’ fees. This court has reviewed the petition, record, and applicable law and determined that relator is not entitled to mandamus relief. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2024CI04406, styled Marlena Reann Calo-oy et al v. AT&T Inc. et al, pending in the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Rosie Alvarado presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-25-00455-CV

IN RE THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE CITY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD OF SAN ANTONIO

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 5, 2025 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On July 14, 2025, relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus challenging respondent’s June 12, 2025 order requiring it to pay the real party in interest $2,540 in attorneys’ fees. This court has reviewed the petition, record, and applicable law and determined that relator is not entitled to mandamus relief. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2024CI04406, styled Marlena Reann Calo-oy et al v. AT&T Inc. et al, pending in the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Rosie Alvarado presiding.

In Re the City of San Antonio, Acting by and Through the City Public Service Board of San Antonio v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

In Re the City of San Antonio, Acting by and Through the City Public Service Board of San Antonio v. the State of Texas (In Re the City of San Antonio, Acting by and Through the City Public Service Board of San Antonio v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.