In re the City of New York

254 A.D.2d 210, 679 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11354
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 27, 1998·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Parness, J.), entered February 9, 1998, awarding claimant condemnee additional amounts for litigation costs pursuant to EDPL 701, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with the IAS Court that a significant portion of claimant’s efforts and costs were expended to develop and present valuation theories to support a claim for compensation substantially in excess of what the court awarded, and see no reason to disturb its exercise of discretion in awarding additional amounts substantially less than what claimant was asking for (see, Hakes v State of New York, 81 NY2d 392, 397). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the City of New York, 254 A.D.2d 210, 679 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11354 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

254 A.D.2d 210 (In re the City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of New York v. Jamaica Arms Hotel, Inc.
44 A.D.3d 1040 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Matter of City of New York
2003 NY Slip Op 51645(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2003)
In re the Acquisition of Real Property by the Village of Johnson City
277 A.D.2d 773 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)