In re the City of New York

45 A.D.2d 962, 359 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4103
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 A.D.2d 573

Opinion

In a condemnation proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 1, 1972, which granted a motion by a claimant to the extent of modifying the second separate and partial final decree so as to increase the rate of interest on the award to 6% and directed additional warrants to be drawn. Order reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. At issue on this appeal is whether the reservation by claimants in a first separate and partial final decree of the right to seek interest of 6% instead of 4% inures to the benefit of a claimant whose condemnation award was provided for in a second separate and partial final decree that did not contain the reservation and from which that claimant did not appeal. The second decree is a separate judgment, which contained no right to seek [963]*963higher interest. The decree became final and the trial court had no jurisdiction to alter its decree in any matter of substance ” (Matter of City of New York [Washington St. Urban Renewal Project], 33 N Y 2d 970, 972). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the City of New York, 45 A.D.2d 962, 359 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4103 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

45 A.D.2d 962 (In re the City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.