In re the City of New York

30 A.D.2d 943, 294 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3217
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 A.D.2d 243

Opinion

Decree entered February 1, 1968 as appealed from unanimously modified on the law by vacating the award for Item 19 of respondent’s fixtures claim and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements to either party. This proceeding is concerned with damage parcels 3 and 6 owned by respondent. The award being vacated is for signs advertising respondent’s business painted on the walls of adjoining buildings not owned by respondent and contained within other damage parcels [944]*944of this over-all condemnation proceeding. While there may well be other meritorious reasons why the award should be vacated, by no stretch of the imagination may the signs be considered fixtures of the parcels here involved. Concur— Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Capozzoli and Macken, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the City of New York, 30 A.D.2d 943, 294 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3217 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

30 A.D.2d 943 (In re the City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.