Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re the City of New York

In re the City of New York

244 A.D. 725
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 236 A.D. 321 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Proceeding in condemnation for the opening of certain streets, including One Hundred and Twenty-sixth street, borough of Queens, from Twenty-third avenue to Twenty-fifth avenue. An award was made for nominal damages. Appellant claims the right to substantial damages on the theory of adverse possession. The claim is not a valid one. (Matter of Village of Olean v. Steyner, 135 N. Y. 341; Smyles v. Hastings, 22 id. 217.) Final decree, in so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present ■—• Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Johnston, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the City of New York, 244 A.D. 725 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

244 A.D. 725 (In re the City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Vil. of Olean v. . Steyner
32 N.E. 9 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)