In re the City of New York

236 A.D. 700
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 229 A.D. 617

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. We agree with the learned Special Term that [701]*701the commissioners were bound by the condemnation map and were without power to determine its correctness and ñx a valuation upon the property upon the theory that the claimants had access to the lake or that the parcels acquired included any portion of the cottage. We also agree that the award made by the commissioners, based upon the correct theory of claimants’ non-access to the lake, is grossly excessive. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the City of New York, 236 A.D. 700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

236 A.D. 700 (In re the City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.