In re the City of New York
194 A.D. 914
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 180 A.D. 430 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1920·Published
Opinion
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and report of commissioners as to damage parcel No. 2 confirmed; and matter remitted to the Special Term with direction to pass upon the question of assessment for benefits. We think that there was no public easement (See Coleman v. City of New York, not reported), and that there was no sufficient proof to establish the existence of any private easement. Jenks, P. J., Rich, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the City of New York, 194 A.D. 914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).
194 A.D. 914 (In re the City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.