In re the City of New York
425 N.E.2d 897, 54 N.Y.2d 667, 442 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2618
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 58 N.Y.2d 532 →
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Decree appealed from and order of the Appellate Division brought up for review affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (47 AD2d 644). There is nothing in the record to indicate otherwise and claimants conceded on oral argument that the taking was of no more than a slope easement.
[669]*669Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the City of New York, 425 N.E.2d 897, 54 N.Y.2d 667, 442 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2618 (N.Y. 1981).
425 N.E.2d 897 (In re the City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.