In re the City of New York

210 N.E.2d 459, 16 N.Y.2d 828, 263 N.Y.S.2d 169, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1254
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 9, 1965·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Motion by appellants Gomatel Realty and Construction Corp. and Pyramid Garage Corp. for reargument denied. Motion by same appellants to amend remittitur to remand case to Appellate Division denied. Motion by same appellants otherwise to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Movants-appellants contended that the application of section 3-a of the General Municipal Law to a judgment or accrued claim arising out of a condemnation proceeding deprived them of their right to just compensation and contended that they received less than just compensation with regard to damage parcels 27 and 412, all in violation of their rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that appellants’ constitutional rights had not been violated. [See 16 N Y 2d 497.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the City of New York, 210 N.E.2d 459, 16 N.Y.2d 828, 263 N.Y.S.2d 169, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1254 (N.Y. 1965).

210 N.E.2d 459 (In re the City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re USA Niagara Development Corp.
51 A.D.3d 377 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Housing Authority of Little Rock v. Rochelle
459 S.W.2d 794 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1970)