In re the Care & Treatment of Aldridge

Missouri Court of Appeals

In re the Care & Treatment of Aldridge

367 S.W.3d 159, 2012 WL 1861519, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 701

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 22, 2012·No. No. ED 96765·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Samuel Aldridge appeals from a judgment committing him to secure confinement in the custody of the Missouri Department of Mental Health as a sexually violent predator following a jury trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2011).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Samuel Aldridge appeals from a judgment committing him to secure confinement in the custody of the Missouri Department of Mental Health as a sexually violent predator following a jury trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2011).

In re the Care & Treatment of Aldridge, 367 S.W.3d 159, 2012 WL 1861519, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 701 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

367 S.W.3d 159 (In re the Care & Treatment of Aldridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.