In re the Brooklyn Bar Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Brooklyn Bar Ass'n

253 A.D. 813, 1 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8730

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 10, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D. 813 (In re the Brooklyn Bar Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Brooklyn Bar Ass'n, 253 A.D. 813, 1 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8730 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion of respondent for an order rescinding the order of reference dated May 21, 1937, and dismissing these disciplinary proceedings granted to the extent only of rescinding the order of reference. The respondent has settled his civil liability to the complainant arising from his failure to prosecute her claim against which the Statute of Limitations has run. The Brooldyn Bar Association opposes the motion to the extent only of suggesting that the respondent should be censured and admonished to be more attentive to the obligations of his office. Such censure is imposed and such admonition is given, and these proceedings thereby terminated. Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ. [See 251 App. Div. 732.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of respondent for an order rescinding the order of reference dated May 21, 1937, and dismissing these disciplinary proceedings granted to the extent only of rescinding the order of reference. The respondent has settled his civil liability to the complainant arising from his failure to prosecute her claim against which the Statute of Limitations has run. The Brooldyn Bar Association opposes the motion to the extent only of suggesting that the respondent should be censured and admonished to be more attentive to the obligations of his office. Such censure is imposed and such admonition is given, and these proceedings thereby terminated. Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ. [See 251 App. Div. 732.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D. 813, 1 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-brooklyn-bar-assn-nyappdiv-1938.